Review Policy

G.A.R.B.A.G.E. employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic quality and integrity.

Review Criteria

• Originality: Does the work present novel ideas or approaches?
• Methodology: Are the methods appropriate and well-described?
• Significance: Does the research contribute meaningfully to the field?
• Clarity: Is the writing clear and well-organized?
• Validity: Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Reviewers are expected to:

• Complete reviews within 3 weeks of acceptance
• Maintain confidentiality of all manuscript information
• Declare any conflicts of interest
• Provide constructive, specific feedback
• Avoid personal criticism of authors

After peer review, the Editor will make one of the following decisions:

• Accept: Manuscript is accepted as-is
• Minor Revision: Small changes needed before acceptance
• Major Revision: Significant changes required
• Reject: Manuscript does not meet publication criteria

Authors who disagree with editorial decisions may submit an appeal within 30 days. Appeals should include a detailed response to reviewer comments and explain why the decision should be reconsidered.